Saturday, April 8, 2017

Paper 1 Response 'The Ballot or The Bullet'

Extract from The Ballot or The Bullet by Malcolm X. 
          The text presented is an extract from Malcolm X’s (1925-1965) speech called The Ballot or the Bullet delivered on April 3rd, 1964. Malcolm X, also known as El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, was an African-American Muslim minister and human rights activist in the work frame of political and social values such as inequality, hegemonic power, and alterity. Furthermore, the extract associates with the conventions of a political speech such as the use of rhetorical devices, slogans, emotive language and rhetoric that is sculpted to persuade and inform the target audience regarding a political and social issue. Relating to the extract of The Ballot or the Bullet, Malcolm applies a variety of rhetorical devices and literary techniques as well as societal, and political events to appeal to his target audience. Henceforth, the purpose of this political speech is to advocate black rights and persuade the philosophy of black nationalism towards the “young generation” of black community voters by illustrating how future blockage of African American equality demands violence. Through the use of various rhetorical devices and structural conventions, Malcolm develops a persuasive text which calls for action in his political speech amongst the African American society during the Civil Rights era.

            Considering the advocacy of African American equality, rights and the black nationalism philosophy that is exemplified in the extract, Malcolm implies that the target audience are individuals from the black society. This is evident in Malcolm’s references of “colonial power” in America, illustrating the “second-class citizenship” due to slavery. This is also evident regarding his perspective on approaching “nationalism to remove colonialism.” Malcolm refers to the audience as “you” and “us,” inferring that the audience are “22 million Afro-Americans here in this country”. Furthermore, in his introductory paragraph, Malcolm stresses that “black nationalism is a self-help philosophy… that eliminates the necessity for division and argument”. Malcolm displays this division by expressing that black nationalism is present in all black individuals and exemplifies a culture of acceptance, including specific references to those who go to “church,” are “atheist” or take part in “any kind of civic organization.” It is also evident that Malcolm specifically targets his audience to the “new generation” such as “a young black man.” In his concluding statements, Malcolm illustrates the failure of previous African American equality. This is evident in his references to “our people are disillusioned. They’ve become disenchanted. They’ve become dissatisfied, and in their frustrations they want action… old Uncle Tom action is outdated”. This is contrasted to his references of the “young generation” that “don’t want to hear anything about the odds against us.” This infers the cultural values that his target audience celebrates and respects his aim of “doing some standing, and some fighting to back that up.” It is a culture of advocating human rights and voicing their stance in political discredit. It also infers that his speech is directly targeting African American individuals of a low to middle-class socioeconomic status in their early 20s-30s. From this analysis, it can be concluded that the political speech aims to call for action on African American equality and political justice.

            Malcolm achieves this purpose of political justice through illuminating the content of the cultural and historical context. Malcolm unfolds his speech with a justification of the “self-help philosophy,” illustrating its elimination of “division and argument” to attract all members of the black society. He then conveys the importance of change in “your philosophy” and “thought pattern” to further motivate his beliefs which persuades the audience through moral values. To ground this persuasive moral concept, Malcolm introduces the history of independence in Asia and Africa through “the philosophy of nationalism.” Furthermore, he recalls and compares the history of previous independent nations such as Asia and Africa as well as marches to exemplify the urgency of a call for action in 1964. While Malcolm introduces his aim in the first paragraph, he further develops this argument through these historical events which support his idea of voicing political justice and equality to his target audience. Henceforth, through the use of pathos and logos, the audience carries a direct emotion of responsibility to take action towards Malcolm’s advocacy. Moreover, the content of the text re-enforces and establishes the fundamental themes present in the political speech. The main ideas that are continuously demonstrated are those of equality, responsibility, unity and urgency. This is evident in his continuous use of diction such as “independence,” “hypocritical colonial power” and “attitude.” Hence, as Malcolm attempts to appeal to his target audience, he links sensitive and emotional history to further spark urgency and call for action in his society.

            Within Malcolm’s approach, the overall tone that is present is one of urgency and unity. As Malcolm highlights the importance of change, he achieves this by claiming petty to those who “are black” and “not thinking black at this late date,” Furthermore, he claims that “today, our people are disillusioned. They’ve become disenchanted. They’ve become dissatisfied, and in their frustrations they want action”. Through expressing and voicing the painful emotions of his community, he reaches his climatic statement by stating “And in 1964 you’ll see this young black man, this new generation asking for the ballot or the bullet.” This didactic and preachy tone carefully balances with the success to call for action within the extract. Subsequently, the tone leads to a mood of rebellious hope and action that is evident in his concluding statement “the young generation don’t want to hear anything about the odds… What do we care about odds?” Henceforth, the overall tone and mood further stimulate the purpose, through developing his audience’s emotions towards the urgent movement of their Civil Rights.

            Malcolm also employs rhetorical devices to further stimulate the purpose of his political speech. As mentioned earlier, Malcolm refers to his target audience as “they” and “us.” The use of personal pronouns leads the audience to associate with his decision making, setting a role model for society. This use of inclusive diction enhances the audience’s attention to the speaker and also stimulates direct action from the younger generation. In addition, Malcolm uses hypophora such as “What’s is so good about it?” and “What goes with it?” to gain direct attention from the audience without diverting the listener’s focus. As this is followed with parallelism of the answer to the question, it allows the audience to link back to their cultural and communal values and beliefs and eliminate any misunderstanding between the speaker and the audience. Throughout the speech, Malcolm also applies rhetorical devices such as chiasmus, repetition, and symploce to establish rhythm. By repeating words such as “Once you change,” “They’ve” and “Every nation” at the beginning or end of successive clauses, the rhythm intensifies the development of passion, tension, and mood throughout the speech. In return, this stokes energy and enthusiasm towards the audience, ultimately illuminating Malcolm’s expectations from the African American society. Subsequently, Malcolm is able to successively develop the purpose of the speech, as the audience is trapped into the decision making of group dynamics.
            Furthermore, it is important to note that Malcolm uses African American Vernacular English (AAVE) to further stress and express the roots of “black nationalism.” This includes diction such as unmarked third person singular verbs in the sentence “you not thinking Black.” As well as verb alteration, such as “you gotta sit” and “how you gonna tell me.” Significantly, Malcolm applies AAVE grammar throughout his speech to appeal to his target audience, but also to further reinforce African American equality movements against white supremacy, hegemonic ruling classes, and alterity.
Another significant rhetorical strategy that Malcolm employs in the second paragraphs is the appeal of ethos in which Malcolm states “They try and make you think they set you free by calling you a second-class citizen. No, you’re nothing but a 20th century slave,” and “he tricked you.” This is an example of a fear persuasion technique, in which Malcolm stokes the fear to be neglected and fooled by society. This also appeals to the group dynamics and extrapolation persuasive techniques, leading the audience to support Malcolm’s cause as their emotions are discouraged through the potent atmosphere. In Malcolm’s fourth paragraph, he intensifies this emotion by providing a simple solution of uniting together as a society. As Malcolm oversimplifies the complex relationship between the government through the use of meiosis, the audience is urged to unite together wholly. By comparing the black community’s “explosive” character to the “atomic bombs” of the Russians, Malcolm illustrates the potential of the black community through uniting. Through demonstrating this confidence to the audience, Malcolm balances and reinforces these emotions to translate into inspiration and the emotion of feeling responsible for voicing their rights. He then provides the audience to the decision making between the ballot or the bullet, which is a metaphor for liberty or death. This further relates to the purpose of the text, as it automatically instills fear to the audience leading them to acknowledge the importance of voting. To conclude, Malcolm demonstrates a wide variety of rhetorical devices to appeal to pathos, ethos, and logos to testify the purpose of urgent action towards his audience.

In regards to the structure of the political speech, Malcolm employs a critical balance between content to achieve his purpose. As aforementioned in the analysis of the content of the extract, Malcolm illustrates logos and ethos through linking historical context to emotion to call for action. Subsequently, Malcolm achieves this through developing the movement of action by paralleling it to the history of African Americans. Through the reference to events such as the “March on Washington” and gospel quotes such as “we shall overcome,” Malcolm is able to appeal and develop the sense of urgency towards his cause directly on an individual level.

Finally, Malcolm employed a variety of rhetorical devices and structural conventions to appeal to his community in his urge for constitutional changes regarding African American equality, hegemonic power, and alterity. All in all, it is critical to consider the political speech The Ballot or the Bullet through a larger lens to broaden knowledge regarding its deep roots in Black culture. Perhaps, the decision between the ballot and the bullet may just be as relevant today as it was during the Civil Rights Movement during the 19th century. 

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Theme of Power | Coriolanus

            The political play Coriolanus (1605-1608), sets in the early Republican Rome in 491 B.C. Shakespeare projects the transition of power from a monarchy to a democratic government, where officials are elected. Due to this shift in power, Shakespeare indulges and develops this theme of power to display the battle of social and political power developing to its principles. Shakespeare achieves this by presenting various characters who represent different respective fates and natures of power. While the protagonist, Caius Martius Coriolanus, trivializes the plebeian’s “breaths,” he beholds a fate of authority and is characterized as a demigod who is an influential leader in warfare. However, Coriolanus’ virtue of power changes, as his flaw of his pride critically leads him to his downfall in Act 5. This is also presented near the end of the play as his power leads to an instilled fear in Rome. At first, Coriolanus is like a “lonely dragon” (IV.iii.), developing to fight “dragon-like” (IV.vii) and finally grows “from a man to a dragon” (V.iv). This displays the danger that arises from his ancient and archaic power which is no longer suitable in Rome. His inflexible nature is stretched by Volumnia through her persuasive techniques regarding her desire for violence and power. Contrarily to Coriolanus, Volumnia and Aufidius are attentive of the changes in politics and parliament. Hence, the downfall of Coriolanus’ power articulates Shakespeare’s theme, communicating that inflexible and archaic power within the context of an evolving England cannot allow for a reconstruction of the political system. Furthermore, Shakespeare questions the audience regarding the virtues of power to communicate that the nature of physical and political power is a continuously changing potential which must flow with society for success to emerge, in which compassion takes no pivotal stance. 

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Coriolanus Act I- Characterization of Coriolanus

What is Shakespeare’s larger purpose in his characterization of Coriolanus in Act I?

Throughout Act I of the political play Coriolanus (1605-1608), Shakespeare’s direct and indirect characterization of Caius Martius (Coriolanus) illustrates his tragic, heroic qualities within the ongoing conflict between the commonalty and the patricians of Rome. By doing so, Shakespeare portrays Martius’ motif of power and settings of politics, power, and war.

In Act I, scene I Shakespeare introduces the fundamental conflict between the plebeians and patricians through the intertwining political motives of power. The scene is set during the rioting and revolts against the patricians, as they accuse them of hoarding grain during the famine. They strongly command to configure the price of grain instead of the Senate. Within these riots, the citizens single out Caius Martius and refer to him as a “chief enemy to the people,” (I.i.7-8) who “a very dog to the commonalty” (I.i.27-28). This illustrates his opposing and brash character, which foreshadows his downfall in Act V. While Menenius’ efforts to subdue the plebeians through the body parable metaphor of the belly, Coriolanus depicts his distinct attitude towards the citizens referring to them as “dissentious rogues” (I.i.174), “curs” (I.i.179) and “Hang ‘em!” (I.i.203). Shakespeare has introduced this attitude to display the existing hierarchy during the Roman time in its effects on society’s revolts.

Volumnia also helps round Coriolanus’ character as she states to Virgilia that “if my son were my husband, I should freelier rejoice in that absence wherein he won honor than in the embracement’s of his bed where he would show most love.” (I.iii.1-5). Volumnia’s love for violence, yet caring nature, allows Coriolanus’s motivation to spark as he encourages him to seek political office.

During the battle at Corioles with the Volsces, Martius’ character is further displayed by his similar attitude of the citizens to his soldiers, claiming they are “souls of geese” and “plagues.” However, due to his bravery and desperation, many seem to look up to him as a role model to eliminate the Volsces. This can be seen in his inspiring yet threatening announcement; “If any think brave death outweighs bad life, And that his country’s dearer than himself; Let him alone, or so many so minded, Wave this to express his disposition And follow Martius.” His bravery and singular importance are particularly noticeable in the quote “who sensibly outdares his senseless sword, and when it bows, stands up.”Not only does Shakespeare characterize Martius with these heroic traits, but his actions also reinforce this notion. Martius singlehandedly fights and opens the gates of Corioles, allowing the Romans to capture the city. The act of one man versus an army of a city portrays him as a godlike, perhaps supernatural fighter, a typical trait of classic heroes. These acts contrast his attitudes towards the commonalty of his nation. During the battle, Martius is proven to display generosity and high strength and bravery for his city. Whereas in the first scenes, the commonalty sees him as a “chief enemy of the people.” Hence, Shakespeare demonstrates Martius’ ability to adapt to his power to provoke a demigod representation and bold (yet provincial) characteristics.

While Shakespeare displays Coriolanus as a classic hero, his continuing arrogant attitude in his return to Rome foreshadows his downfall in Act V. Shakespeare’s contrasting portrayal of a conventional hero in both scenes are present; a godlike hero in the war yet a tragic hero in Rome. This, in return, further stimulates Shakespeare’s purpose of Act I in his characterization of Coriolanus.
(572 words)

Friday, February 10, 2017

Language, Power and Resistance

Bell's quote: "For in the incorrect usage of words, in the incorrect placement of words, was a spirit of rebellion that claimed language as a site of resistance. Using English in a way that ruptured standard usage and meaning, so that white folk could often not understand black speech, made English into more than the oppressor’s language."

Primary Text: “Follow the Drinking Gourd.” (Listen to the song or read the lyrics)

Fleeing slaves
The spirit of rebellion that claimed as a site of resistance is especially prominent in the “slave quilt code,” which is a term used to describe the quilts to communicate information to pave their way of escape towards freedom. The American folk song “Follow the Drinking Gourd” was published in 1928. Supposedly, the folk song was used by Underground Railroad operative, called Peg Leg Joe, in his aims to conceal the escape map. This map of directions allowed fleeing slaves to reach the north from Mobile, Alabama to the Ohio River. Furthermore, the “drinking gourd” refers to a hollowed-out gourd used by slaves as a water cup. This folk song is a prime example of the slave quilt code, as the “Drinking Gourd” was a code name for the Big Dipper star formation, which follows to Polaris, the North and the Pole Star to freedom.

Drinking gourd
The Drinking Gourd had a pivotal role in the Civil Rights and folk revival movements during the 1950s and 1960s, as it displays the remnants of the pre-Civil War South map songs. Specifically, Northern states with abolitionist societies and benevolent groups, such as New York and Massachusetts, would help to flee slaves who came from Southern slave states. Their goal was to reach Canada, where slavery was prohibited. Hence, to arrive at this final destination, a map song was a clue they heavily relied on to find out where exactly the North to freedom was. The Polaris, also known as the Ursa Major or Big Bear was known in slave quilt code as a dipper. Hence, its reference to the “Drinking Gourd.”

           When referring to the map song, several clues are embedded within the lyrics that project its reference to a rebellious spirit, which “ruptured standard meaning, so that white folk could often not understand black speech.” The song states “The river bank makes a mighty good road, / The dead trees show you the way. / Left foot, peg foot, traveling on/ Follow the Drinking Gourd” referring to the Tombigbee River in Mississippi. “The river ends between 2 hills/ Follow the Drinking Gourd. / There’s another river on the other side/ Follow the Drinking Gourd.” Referring that when the Tombigbee River ended, they should go to over the hills until they reach the Tennessee River. Finally, “When the great big river meets the little river, / Follow the Drinking Gourd. / For the old man is a-waiting to carry you to freedom/ If you follow the Drinking Gourd.” Referencing where the Tennessee River meets the Ohio River. Once crossed the Ohio river, they could go to the Underground Railroad system, as free territory.

Thus, this map song is a significant source of demonstrating the manipulation of the meaning of standard English to help to flee slaves and obstruct white folks who spoke the oppressor’s language. Furthermore, this folk song illustrates its participation in developing a language and culture of resistance and rebellion, to free their individuals from the oppressor’s language and oppressing community. 

Works Cited
Bresler, Joel. "Introduction." "Follow the Drinking Gourd": A Cultural History. N.p., 2008. Web. 10 Feb. 2017.
Maryland Public Television. "Pathways to Freedom | Secrets: Signs and Symbols | Follow the Drinking Gourd." Pathways to Freedom | Secrets: Signs and Symbols | Follow the Drinking Gourd. Maryland & the Underground Railroad, n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2017.
Maryland Public Television. "Pathways to Freedom | Secrets: Signs and Symbols | Follow the Drinking Gourd." Pathways to Freedom | Secrets: Signs and Symbols | Follow the Drinking Gourd. Maryland & the Underground Railroad, n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2017.

Saturday, January 21, 2017

Endangered Language Podcast- Kallawaya

Attached is the podcast I made with Hala Ariqat, discussing the endangered language Kallawaya. 


Works Cited
         "Bolivia: Global Warming Endangers Kallawaya Healers." WilderUtopia.com. N.p., 06 Feb.   2014. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.
          "Kallawaya." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.
    "Kallawaya - Highland South America Language Hotspot - Living Tongues Institute For Endangered Languages." Kallawaya - Highland South America Language Hotspot - Living Tongues Institute For Endangered Languages. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.
     Favorite, Crowd. "Languages Going Extinct Fastest in 5 Regions Around World: One Language Dies Every 14 Days." National Geographic Society Press Room. N.p., 05 July 2012. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.
    "Revitalization." Enduring Voices Project, Endangered Languages, Map, Facts, Photos, Videos -- National Geographic. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.
"Screening of "The Linguists," featuring Professor David Harrison." The Daily Gazette. N.p., 27 Mar. 2008. Web. 21 Jan. 2017.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Speaking in Tongues | The Value of Indigenous Languages

What is the value of preserving indigenous languages?    
         In today’s society, approximately half of the world’s languages are coming face to face with ‘black hole of extinction.' Does it matter? Should we care? The report Back to Babel, published by Time magazine in 1997, examines this globalization concern in light of language extinction and its entanglement with one’s culture, power, and knowledge. Specifically, the article expresses its concerns regarding the critical value that is intertwined when preserving indigenous and aboriginal languages.

            Approximately half of the 6,500 languages that are spoken today are one the verge of extinction or have already reached their destination in the black hole of extinction. With languages dying roughly every two weeks, Stephen Wurm states that “More conflicts have been created between the world’s languages than ever before, causing languages to disappear at an increasing rate.” Furthermore, the uprising pressure that is pushing on the linguistic natural selection of languages is mainly caused by the “economic might, military muscle and cultural prestige of the country in which a language is spoken” (Times Magazine). This pressure is especially noticeable when analyzing the value of preserving indigenous languages from the Pacific basin, which claim over one-fifth of all existing languages. In this case, its pressure arose from European colonization, causing an unstable climate for native languages. For example, before white settlers claimed their first arrival in Australia in 1788, the area spoke approximately 250 tongues. After the settlement, however, indigenous languages decreased to only 20 tongues.

            According to Max Weinreich, “a language is a dialect with an army and a navy.” referring to its protectionism and suited harness that is required from linguistic extinction. Furthermore, languages paint our emotions, grasp our experiences and portray the observations of our surroundings. A language is essentially a crucial and central puzzle piece of a culture’s identity and the lens in which they digest and interpret their environment. Rhonda Inkamala, a language coordinator in Alice Springs, once stated “You feel lost without it, … You feel left out.”. This further illustrates the painful emotion many Aboriginal individuals experience, as the evanesce on their traditional language “leaves a painful gap in their sense of self” (Times Magazine).

            The true value that is gained from preserving these aboriginal languages primarily reliant on the absorbance and studies of their rich vocabularies and poetic beauty. Aboriginal languages are widely known for their rich vocabularies used to express the natural world. The use of evocative imagery further evokes how close Aboriginal clans are interconnected with mother nature. For example, the Ngiyampaa language describes “a bird whose tail twitches like a walu” (Times Magazine). Also, the Arrernte language describes “the smell of rain” with the word nyimpe. In both cases, English does not have a direct translation that can be made. This further settles the enormous gap that is existent between the languages’ poetic beauty in describing nature.

            Furthermore, aboriginal languages also convey significant scientific advances compared to other dominant languages. Due to their close relationship with the earth, Botanists now have the ability to discover new species using the Aboriginal words given to flora and fauna. Therefore, the further existence and preservation of indigenous languages contribute significantly to archeological facts and cultural expressions. As Evans once stated “We can infer a lot about Australia’s ancient past through looking at information furnished by languages. This is lost when the language goes.” (Times Magazine).

            Once an indigenous language goes extinct, much more is lost than simply its tool and service of communication; its cultural expression, vocabulary, poetic beauty, discoveries and scientific advances are also lost in the “black hole of extinction.” The value of aboriginal languages does not solely depend on protecting its existence. Preserving its existence has significant implications and values that are crucial to one’s identity and cultural interpretation, which are necessary for their present and future understanding of the world. While the influence of colonial languages such as English and Spanish hinder the revival of these languages, efforts should be integrated to fight against the tremendous forces of globalization and mass culture.